Prediction of Patrick Zahraj [276th] vs Santiago Rodriguez Taverna [265th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W L L W L
Form
W L W W W W W L W WHead To Head: Zahraj 0 - 0 Taverna
| Zahraj | Stats | Taverna |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (19-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (21-12) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 276 | Ranking | 265 |
| 272 | Highest Rank | 157 |
| 25 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 8 |
| 58% (131-94) | Career Total W/L | 59% (337-236) |
| $3,650 | Career Prize Money | $128,000 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patrick Zahraj vs Santiago Rodriguez Taverna Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zahraj 0 - 0 Taverna
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zahraj has won 42.14% of points on their second serve, while Taverna has won 46.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zahraj, in recent form, has won 50.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Taverna has won 45.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.51% and 30.89% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zahraj has saved 53.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Taverna has saved 55.1% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zahraj has won 58.82% of matches played (W/L 50/ 35), with Taverna winning 56.41% (W/L 44/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zahraj has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 41/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 19/ 17). Taverna has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 92/ 54), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Zahraj has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.42% of matches (W/L 29/ 19), where as Taverna has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 26/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zahraj has played against opponents with an average rank of 173.12 while Taverna has played against players with an average rank of 217.35.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zahraj has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Taverna has won 73% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zahraj has converted 33.99% of breakpoint opportunities, and Taverna has converted 31.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Patrick Zahraj vs Santiago Rodriguez Taverna Best Odds For The Match
Patrick Zahraj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 4-6 6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Alvin Nicholas Tudorica
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Patrick Zahraj
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
40%
(
26 of
65)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Zahraj
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
68
|
6-7(5) 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Felix Corwin
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Patrick Zahraj
73%
(
74 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
8
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Arthur Fery
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mae Malige
63%
(
69 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
48 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Alexey Vatutin
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Patrick Zahraj
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Juan Manuel La Serna
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
94)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Alejo Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Santiago De La Fuente
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
47 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Victor Lilov
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
54
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Mateo Del Pino
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
7
Total Points Won
3
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Nicolas Bruna
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Zahraj vs Taverna?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Zahraj Vs Taverna is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (131/94) | Win/Loss | 59% (337/236) |
| 57% (290/218) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (751/603) |
| 53% (2550/2268) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6681/6278) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 750 | Aces Total | 1447 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 844 | Total Double Faults | 1349 |
| 1:26:41 | Average Match Time | 1:40:47 |
| 150.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 278.95 |
| 62% (7620/12281) | 1st Serve % | 62% (23441/37902) |
| 68% (5203/7620) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (15529/23441) |
| 45% (2079/4661) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7140/14461) |
| 43% (600/1389) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1651/3995) |
| 42% (5314/12518) | Return Points Win % | 41% (15368/37800) |
| 59% (130/220) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (330/563) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 55% (32/58) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (98/181) |
| 54% (33/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (126/203) |
| 86% (130/112) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (307/270) |
| 13% (130/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (307/36) |
| 20% (95/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (266/65) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
View full predicted draw for Taverna
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
